Dyspepsia
Section 8: Development of the guideline

8.1 Introduction

SIGN is a collaborative network of clinicians, other health care professionals and patient organisations funded by the Scottish Executive Health Department. SIGN guidelines are developed by multidisciplinary groups using a standard methodology based on a systematic review of the evidence. Further details about SIGN and the guideline development methodology are contained in “SIGN 50: A guideline developer’s handbook”, available at www.sign.ac.uk

8.2 The guideline development group

The membership of the guideline development group was confirmed following consultation with the member organisations of SIGN. Declarations of interests were made by all members of the guideline development group. Further details are available from the SIGN Executive.

SIGN is also grateful to the following for contributing to particular sections of this guideline:

8.3 Systematic literature review

The evidence base for this guideline was synthesised in accordance with SIGN methodology. A systematic review of the literature was carried out using an explicit search strategy devised by the SIGN Information Officer in collaboration with members of the guideline development group.

Searches were restricted to systematic reviews, meta-analyses, RCTs, and longitudinal studies. Internet searches were carried out on the Web sites of the Canadian Practice Guidelines Infobase, the New Zealand Guidelines Programme, the UK Health Technology Assessment Programme, the US National Guidelines Clearinghouse, and the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Searches were also carried out using Google and OMNI search engines, and all suitable links followed up. Database searches were carried out on Cochrane Library, Embase 1990 to 2000, and Medline 1990 to 2000. Embase and Medline searches were later extended back to 1980 in relation to specific questions where more recent evidence was lacking. All searches were later updated to 2001.

An independent information specialist reviewed the search strategies. The Medline version of the main search strategies is available on the SIGN Web site, in the section covering supporting material for published guidelines. The main searches were supplemented by material identified by individual members of the development group. All selected papers were evaluated using standard methodological checklists before conclusions were considered as evidence.

8.4 Consultation and peer review

8.4.1 NATIONAL OPEN MEETING

The national open meeting is the main consultative phase of SIGN guideline development, at which the guideline development group presents their draft recommendations for the first time. The national open meeting for this guideline was held in October 2001 and was attended by all of the key specialties relevant to the guideline. The draft guideline was also available on the SIGN web site for a limited period at this stage to allow those unable to attend the meeting to contribute to the development of the guideline.

8.4.2 SPECIALIST REVIEW

The guideline was also reviewed in draft form by a panel of independent expert referees, who were asked to comment primarily on the comprehensiveness and accuracy of interpretation of the evidence base supporting the recommendations in the guideline. SIGN is very grateful to all of these experts for their contribution to this guideline.

8.4.3 EDITORIAL GROUP

As a final quality control check, the guideline is reviewed by an Editorial Group comprising the relevant specialty representatives on SIGN Council to ensure that the peer reviewers’ comments have been addressed adequately and that any risk of bias in the guideline development process as a whole has been minimised. The Editorial Group for this guideline was as follows:

[Contents][Back][Top] [Next]

Home